Complete rehabilitation for edentulism without bone grafting: a solution for a 70-year-old patient
- A 70-year-old patient contacted with complaints of partial edentulism and poor retention of removable dentures. This is a typical situation in which quality of life is significantly reduced: chewing, speech and self-confidence are all compromised.
- Following a comprehensive clinical and radiographic examination, a decision was made to proceed with complete rehabilitation: extraction of the remaining teeth and placement of implants followed by prosthetic restoration.
- Special attention was paid to the anatomical conditions of the upper jaw – moderate bone atrophy and pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses were noted. In such cases, the classic approach often requires a sinus lift and bone grafting which increases the duration and cost of treatment.
- We chose more modern and minimally invasive strategy: • 2 implants in the anterior area • 1 angled implant on the left • 1 zygomatic implant on the right • 2 pterygoid implants in the area of the maxillary tuberosities This approach allowed us to: • completely avoid a sinus lift • shorten the treatment duration • reduce costs by eliminating the need for bone grafting
- The surgery was performed under general anesthesia and took around 5 hours. The entire surgical stage was completed during this time.
- Within a week, the patient was fitted with two FP-3 temporary prostheses, color A2, with artificial gums and anatomically calibrated teeth. At this stage, the patient: • strictly follows recommendations • regularly attends follow-up checkups • notes a significant improvement the quality of life
- A significant aesthetic and functional result were achieved – chewing efficiency, diction, and self-confidence were restored.
- We chose more modern and minimally invasive strategy: • 2 implants in the anterior area • 1 angled implant on the left • 1 zygomatic implant on the right • 2 pterygoid implants in the area of the maxillary tuberosities This approach allowed us to: • completely avoid a sinus lift • shorten the treatment duration • reduce costs by eliminating the need for bone grafting
In brief: for a 70-year-old patient with partial edentulism, upper-jaw atrophy and sinus pneumatization, we performed a full fixed rehabilitation without bone grafting or a sinus lift. We used 6 supports: 2 anterior, 1 angled, 1 zygomatic (zygoma) and 2 pterygoid implants. Surgery under general anaesthesia took about 5 hours; fixed FP-3 temporary prostheses were placed within a week. Systematic reviews report zygomatic implant survival of around 96% over long-term follow-up.
Key facts
| Patient | 70 years old, partial maxillary edentulism |
| Problem | Bone atrophy + maxillary sinus pneumatization, poor denture retention |
| Solution | 2 anterior + 1 angled + 1 zygoma + 2 pterygoid = 6 supports |
| Avoided | No sinus lift, no bone grafting |
| Surgery | Under general anaesthesia, ~5 hours, single stage |
| Prosthesis | Fixed FP-3, shade A2, within a week |
| Prognosis | High; zygoma survival ~96% (systematic reviews) |
Zygomatic (zygoma) and pterygoid implants — what they are
A zygomatic (zygoma) implant is an elongated implant anchored not in the atrophied upper jaw but in the massive cheekbone (zygoma). A pterygoid implant is placed in the dense bone of the pterygoid process at the back of the upper jaw. Both are used in severe atrophy and sinus pneumatization, where conventional implantation would require a sinus lift and bone augmentation. Anchorage in dense bone often allows immediate or early loading with a fixed prosthesis.
Stage 1. Diagnosis and digital planning
We performed a comprehensive clinical and radiographic examination, CBCT of both jaws and digital 3D planning. We assessed bone volume and density, the position of the sinuses and the mandibular nerve, and planned each implant position “to the future teeth”.
- CBCT + digital plan = predictable implant positions.
- We accounted for moderate atrophy and sinus pneumatization.
- Implants are planned from the position of the future restoration.
Stage 2. Choosing a graft-free protocol
The classic approach here would have required a sinus lift and bone grafting — extra surgeries, months of waiting and higher cost. We chose zygomatic and pterygoid supports anchored in dense bone, bypassing the atrophied areas and sinuses.
- Zygomatic implants bypass the maxillary sinus and atrophy.
- Pterygoid implants use the dense bone of the pterygoid process.
- Fewer surgeries, shorter timeline, lower cost.
Stage 3. Surgery under general anaesthesia
Surgery lasted about 5 hours under general anaesthesia: the remaining teeth were extracted and all 6 implants placed. General anaesthesia ensured patient comfort during the long procedure, and the entire surgical scope was completed in one visit.
- Extractions and implant placement — in one operation.
- General anaesthesia — comfort during a long procedure.
Stage 4. Immediate fixed FP-3 prostheses
Within a week we placed two FP-3 fixed temporary prostheses (with artificial gums), shade A2, with anatomically calibrated teeth. The patient quickly returned to chewing and smile aesthetics; a permanent restoration is planned after osseointegration.
- FP-3 restores both teeth and the gum contour.
- Early loading is possible thanks to anchorage in dense bone.
- After osseointegration — a permanent (e.g., full-zirconia) restoration.
Conventional implants vs zygoma/pterygoid for an atrophic upper jaw
| Parameter | Conventional + sinus lift/graft | Zygoma + pterygoid |
| Bone grafting | Required | Not required |
| Surgeries / timeline | More, months of waiting | Fewer, single surgical stage |
| Prosthesis loading | Usually delayed | Often immediate/early (within a week) |
| Cost | Higher due to grafting | Lower without grafting |
Result and prognosis
A pronounced functional and aesthetic result was achieved — chewing, speech and self-confidence were restored, and the patient reports a significant improvement in quality of life. The prognosis is favourable: systematic reviews report zygomatic implant survival of around 96% over a mean follow-up of more than 6 years (96–98% in the early years), with immediate loading performing no worse than delayed. The most common complication is sinusitis, so monitoring and hygiene matter. The patient strictly follows the recommendations and attends regular check-ups.
- A fixed restoration without bone grafting or a sinus lift.
- Reduced treatment time and cost.
- High long-term survival of the supports with proper care.
FAQ
Q: Can implants be placed without bone grafting?
A: Yes. With upper-jaw atrophy, zygomatic (zygoma) and pterygoid implants are used, anchored in dense anatomical structures that bypass the atrophied bone and sinuses — this avoids bone augmentation and a sinus lift.
Q: What are zygomatic (zygoma) implants?
A: They are elongated implants placed in the cheekbone. They are used in severe upper-jaw atrophy when conventional implants cannot be placed without prior bone augmentation.
Q: How do pterygoid implants differ from conventional ones?
A: They are placed in the pterygoid process — dense bone at the back of the upper jaw. This provides reliable posterior support without a sinus lift and allows a fixed prosthesis.
Q: Is it safe and painless at the age of 70?
A: Surgery is performed under anaesthesia and is painless. Age itself is not a contraindication — overall health and anatomy, assessed during diagnostics and CBCT, are what matter.
Q: How long do zygomatic implants last?
A: Systematic reviews report survival of around 96% over long-term follow-up (more than 6 years), comparable to conventional implants. Longevity depends on hygiene and regular check-ups.
Q: When is the permanent prosthesis placed?
A: A fixed temporary prosthesis is placed within a week, and the permanent restoration (e.g., full zirconia) is made after complete osseointegration — usually after several months.
Q: Can I chew right after surgery?
A: Thanks to anchorage in dense bone, immediate or early loading with a temporary prosthesis is often possible, so the patient returns to soft chewing soon after surgery and gradually expands the diet.
Clinic of Aesthetic Dentistry (KES), Kyiv — established in 2000; treatment is performed by top-category doctors. This material is informational; the exact plan is defined after an in-person consultation and diagnostics (X-ray/CBCT).